Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Paca House results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 661 hits . Analysis detected 2,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,540 of 37,536 keywords). This William Paca House is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. William Paca House
Keyword details
Total words: 5,024
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst