Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William "buck" Rogers results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (9,622 of 37,536 keywords). This William "buck" Rogers is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
William "buck" Rogers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠75%William "buck" Rogers (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos