Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William "buck" Rogers results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 333 hits . Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of â 75% (9,622 of 37,536 keywords). This William "buck" Rogers is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. William "buck" Rogers
Keyword details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst