‘Buck Rogers’ star Gil Gerard dies at 8266%

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS63%

12/17/2025, 9:17:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 446 faulty-reasoning hits from 586 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.5% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,636 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the article peer group.

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS 
Updated 8:03 AM PST, December 17, 2025 
Actor Gil Gerard poses in Los Angeles, Ca. on July 16, 1990. 
(AP Photo/Reed Saxon, File) 
Gil Gerard, who played television’s hunky sci-fi hero William “Buck” Rogers soon after the Star Wars franchise took hold in the late 1970s, has died. 
He was 82. 
Gerard died Tuesday in hospice as a result of a rare, aggressive form of cancer, said his manager, Tina Presley Borek. 
His wife, Janet Gerard, posted a posthumous Facebook message he left behind for fans that read in part: 
“Don’t waste your time on anything that doesn’t thrill you or bring you love. 
See you out somewhere in the cosmos.” 
Gerard starred in NBC’s campy “Buck Rogers in the 25th Century,” which ran for two seasons from 1979 to 1981. 
A theatrical film based on the series also delighted youngsters and their parents alike. 
It was Rogers’ second turn on TV after a show in the 1950s, a radio series and a 1939 film serial. 
The story was based on Philip Francis Nowlan’s serialized 1928 pulp novella “Armageddon 2419 A.D.” 
Nowlan’s character was named Anthony Rogers. 
The name was changed when the story began running in newspapers as a comic strip. 
“My life has been an amazing journey,” Gerard wrote in his social media post. 
“The opportunities I’ve had, the people I’ve met and the love I have given and received have made my 82 years on the planet deeply satisfying.” 
As the TV story goes, Rogers was a 20th century NASA pilot who was placed in frozen animation when his ship was hit by a meteor storm. 
He pops awake 500 years later in the year 2491. 
He gazes upon a futuristic, domed Earth with all its threats, including aliens, space pilots and the evil Draconians. 
He had helpers: The robot sidekick Twiki and a beautiful space pilot Wilma Deering, played by Erin Gray. 
A native of Little Rock, Arkansas, Gerard worked steadily in TV commercials. 
He was featured in a number of other TV shows and movies, including starring roles in the 1982 TV movie “Hear No Evil” as Dragon and the short-lived “Sidekicks” in 1986. 
In 1992, he hosted the reality series “Code 3,” following firefighters responding to emergency calls around the U.S. 
There were many guest appearances in the 1990s, including on “Days of Our Lives.” 
Gerard and Gray were together again in 2007 for the TV film “Nuclear Hurricane.” 
They also returned to the Buck Rogers universe as Rogers’ parents in the pilot episode of James Cawley’s “Buck Rogers Begins” internet video series in 2009. 
Gerard spoke openly about addictions to drugs, alcohol and compulsive overeating. 
He was the subject of a one-hour documentary, “Action Hero Makeover,” in 2007 after his weight ballooned to 350 pounds. 
Done by Adrienne Crow, then a longtime companion, for the Discovery Health Channel, the film documented his progress after gastric bypass surgery. 
Gerard was married and divorced four times before Janet. 
He had a son, actor Gilbert Vincent Gerard, with model and actor Connie Sellecca. 
Their divorce included a bitter custody battle for “Gib,” who was born in 1981. 
Sellecca was granted main custody. 
“My journey has taken me from Arkansas to New York to Los Angeles, and finally, to my home in North Georgia with my amazing wife, Janet, of 18 years,” Gerard wrote in the post put on Facebook after his death. 
“It’s been a great ride, but inevitably one that comes to a close as mine has.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%The Associated Press: 1.4%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%The Associated Press: 2.8%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%The Associated Press: 11.1%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 7.3%The Associated Press: 1.9%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%The Associated Press: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 11.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias2.4%This article: 21.2%The Associated Press: 3.1%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias21.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%The Associated Press: 2.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 16.4%The Associated Press: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias16.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 4.4%The Associated Press: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal4.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.8%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 5.6%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion2.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon2.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.0%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%

586 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.