Keyword summary
28%1 analyzed article/video996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Bain results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,938 of 37,536 keywords). This William Bain is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
William Bain
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
26%William Bain (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos