Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will-Ferrell results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Actor-Observer Bias , and Halo Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 1,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (14,982 of 35,444 keywords). This Will-Ferrell is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Will-Ferrell
Keyword details
Total words: 2,008
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.7% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst