Keyword summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Safety results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,646 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (32,406 of 37,536 keywords). This Wildlife Safety is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Wildlife Safety
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠14%Wildlife Safety (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,646
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos