Keyword summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 3,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Funding results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 940 hits . Analysis detected 7,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,342 of 37,530 keywords). This Wildlife Funding is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Wildlife Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 10,119
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst