Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Documentaries results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 880 hits . Analysis detected 2,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,427 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,594 of 35,466 keywords). This Wildlife Documentaries is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Wildlife Documentaries
Keyword details
Total words: 2,427
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 36.3% 36.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 36.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst