Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Whoopi Goldberg results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 330 hits . Analysis detected 1,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,686 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,304 keywords). This Whoopi Goldberg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Whoopi Goldberg
Keyword details
Total words: 1,686
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst