Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White House South Lawn results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 605 hits. Analysis detected 3,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This White House South Lawn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
White House South Lawn
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%White House South Lawn (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.8%24.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos