Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Email Survey results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Horn Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 1,276 hits . Analysis detected 8,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,124 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Email Survey is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. White House Email Survey
Keyword details
Total words: 3,243
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.7% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 39.4% 39.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 36.5% 36.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 18.2% 18.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 39.4%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 36.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 1.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.3% Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst