Keyword summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents Journalism Trump Press results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 1,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,935 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (15,718 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Correspondents Journalism Trump Press is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
White House Correspondents Journalism Trump Press
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠59%White House Correspondents Journalism Trump Press (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,935
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos