Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Whatsapp Scams results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 2,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Whatsapp Scams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Whatsapp Scams
Keyword details
Total words: 3,008
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst