Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whale results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 987 hits . Analysis detected 7,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,616 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,681 of 37,536 keywords). This Whale is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Whale
Keyword details
Total words: 13,616
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst