NPR⁠84%

Carcass of Timmy the humpback whale brought to shore in Denmark ⁠63%

By The Associated Press⁠63%

5/30/2026, 12:16:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 780 faulty-reasoning hits from 260 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (8,181 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the article peer group.

ANHOLT, Denmark — The carcass of a humpback whale, whose life and death captivated Germans for months as the mammal became repeatedly stranded in the Baltic Sea, was dragged Saturday onto a Danish beach after two weeks of the body languishing in shallow waters. 
The whale had gained the nicknames "Timmy" and "Hope" as German media outlets sent push alerts and updated live blogs with the status of its health since it was first spotted off the German coast on March 3. 
The whale was found dead on May 14, stranded just off the small island of Anholt in the Kattegat, the broad strait between Denmark and Sweden that connects the Baltic Sea to the North Sea. 
The whale's death ended months of a spectacular and contentious rescue effort that culminated May 2, when the mammal was transported toward the North Sea in a barge in a final effort to guide it back to its natural habitat in the Atlantic Ocean. 
The carcass will be examined next week to determine the cause of death, according to the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. 
Danish news outlet "News5" on Saturday published a livestream of the carcass being dragged onto the shoreline by a cable attached to a truck on the beach. 
It's not clear why it swam into the Baltic Sea, which is far from its habitat and it wasn't suited to, although some experts said it may have lost its way while swimming after a shoal of herring or during migration. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%The Associated Press: 1.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias13.5%This article: 25.0%The Associated Press: 3.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic25.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 16.9%The Associated Press: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%The Associated Press: 11.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect16.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%The Associated Press: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias15.8%This article: 27.3%The Associated Press: 11.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias27.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 16.9%The Associated Press: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias16.9%This article: 14.6%The Associated Press: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect14.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.5%The Associated Press: 3.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority23.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.9%The Associated Press: 5.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion16.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 16.9%The Associated Press: 2.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.8%The Associated Press: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.8%The Associated Press: 1.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote15.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 33.8%The Associated Press: 3.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice33.8%This article: 15.8%The Associated Press: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination15.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%The Associated Press: 0.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.4%

260 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers18%attributed speech213writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageDanish Environmental Protection Agency • 20 words • 0.0% coverageNews5 • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

News5

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words57% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%News5: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-41.3 ptsWriter: 41.3%News5: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-19.2 ptsWriter: 19.2%News5: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-19.2 ptsWriter: 19.2%News5: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.