Keyword summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Westminster results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 2,083 hits . Analysis detected 14,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,099 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (22,937 of 35,692 keywords). This Westminster is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Westminster
Keyword details
Total words: 13,099
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst