Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Western Sahara results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 922 hits. Analysis detected 6,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Western Sahara is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Western Sahara
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Western Sahara (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos