Keyword summary
97%1 analyzed article/video560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Western Institutions results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 3,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,299 of 36,788 keywords). This Western Institutions is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Western Institutions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
89%Western Institutions (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.3% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 38.1%38.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 38.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos