Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wellness Farms results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 4,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (31,189 of 35,668 keywords). This Wellness Farms is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Wellness Farms
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
13%Wellness Farms (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510012.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos