Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wealthy Districts results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 35,444 keywords). This Wealthy Districts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wealthy Districts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Wealthy Districts (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos