Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wbur results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 349 hits . Analysis detected 1,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,232 of 36,389 keywords). This Wbur is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Wbur
Keyword details
Total words: 2,480
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst