Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Water Bill results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 815 hits . Analysis detected 2,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,565 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,192 of 37,536 keywords). This Water Bill is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Water Bill
Keyword details
Total words: 3,565
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst