Keyword summary
52%2 analyzed articles/videos714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Watch For Free results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 1,134 hits. Analysis detected 4,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,275 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,988 of 37,536 keywords). This Watch For Free is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Watch For Free
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Watch For Free (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,275
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 26.5%26.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos