Keyword summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wastewater Surveillance results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 647 hits. Analysis detected 4,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,094 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (16,611 of 35,648 keywords). This Wastewater Surveillance is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Wastewater Surveillance
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
54%Wastewater Surveillance (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,094
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos