Keyword summary
â 0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Supreme Court results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 622 hits . Analysis detected 6,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,298 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 19% (29,347 of 35,995 keywords). This Washington Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Washington Supreme Court
Keyword details
Total words: 8,298
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst