Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Plans results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 3,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,184 of 37,536 keywords). This War Plans is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
War Plans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
65%War Plans (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos