Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 245 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War On Iran results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 6,543 hits . Analysis detected 32,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,182 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,846 of 37,536 keywords). This War On Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. War On Iran
Keyword details
Total words: 21,182
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 30.9% 30.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst