Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Hawks results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 3,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,446 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,569 of 37,536 keywords). This War Hawks is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
War Hawks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%War Hawks (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,446
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.8% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 28.4%28.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.0%22.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.3%24.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 28.4%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos