Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Walter Reed results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,119 hits . Analysis detected 7,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,592 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (22,173 of 35,718 keywords). This Walter Reed is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Walter Reed
Keyword details
Total words: 8,592
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst