Keyword summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These W Kamau Bell results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 2,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (6,540 of 37,536 keywords). This W Kamau Bell is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
W Kamau Bell
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠83%W Kamau Bell (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.3%19.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos