Keyword summary
â 39% 1 analyzed article/video 1,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voting Authority results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 402 hits . Analysis detected 2,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,383 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 29% (26,939 of 37,536 keywords). This Voting Authority is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Voting Authority
Keyword details
Total words: 4,383
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst