Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Voter Fraud Claims results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 937 hits. Analysis detected 4,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,178 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Voter Fraud Claims is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Voter Fraud Claims
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Voter Fraud Claims (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,178
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 43.0%43.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.8%15.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 43.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos