Keyword summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vlt results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,773 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (19,739 of 37,536 keywords). This Vlt is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Vlt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠48%Vlt (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,773
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos