Keyword summary
3% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virtual Reality results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 461 hits . Analysis detected 1,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (35,283 of 36,399 keywords). This Virtual Reality is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Virtual Reality
Keyword details
Total words: 5,452
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst