Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Democrats results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,646 of 37,536 keywords). This Virginia Democrats is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Virginia Democrats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Virginia Democrats (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510069.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos