Keyword summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Viral Bank Of America World Cup Bracelet Resale results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,893 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (17,013 of 37,536 keywords). This Viral Bank Of America World Cup Bracelet Resale is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Viral Bank Of America World Cup Bracelet Resale
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠55%Viral Bank Of America World Cup Bracelet Resale (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,893
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos