Keyword summary
81%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vince Carter results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,137 of 37,536 keywords). This Vince Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Vince Carter
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%Vince Carter (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,689
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos