Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Villain Capital results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 3,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,623 of 37,536 keywords). This Villain Capital is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Villain Capital
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠93%Villain Capital (selected)9%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 38.8%38.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 22.8%22.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 38.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos