Keyword summary
â 8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vienna Convention On Consular Relations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 17% (31,277 of 37,536 keywords). This Vienna Convention On Consular Relations is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Vienna Convention On Consular Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 4,134
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst