Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Beckham results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 2,447 hits. Analysis detected 13,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,232 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (17,015 of 37,536 keywords). This Victoria Beckham is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Victoria Beckham
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠55%Victoria Beckham (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,232
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos