Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Victor Davis Hanson results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 795 hits . Analysis detected 6,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,330 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Victor Davis Hanson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Victor Davis Hanson
Keyword details
Total words: 6,330
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst