Keyword summary
94% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterinary Care results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 2,060 hits . Analysis detected 13,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,161 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,056 of 35,157 keywords). This Veterinary Care is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Veterinary Care
Keyword details
Total words: 7,161
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.1% percentile 4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 28.8% 28.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst