Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vc Defensa results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 4,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,297 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,033 of 35,444 keywords). This Vc Defensa is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Vc Defensa
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
67%Vc Defensa (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,297
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos