Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vatican City results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 294 hits . Analysis detected 2,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (11,843 of 35,675 keywords). This Vatican City is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Vatican City
Keyword details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% No True Scotsman: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst