Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valentine's Day results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 851 hits. Analysis detected 5,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,802 of 37,536 keywords). This Valentine's Day is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Valentine's Day
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Valentine's Day (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510087.2% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 25.6%25.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.5%12.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 28.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos