Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utsa Roadrunners results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Special Pleading , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 612 hits . Analysis detected 3,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,058 of 37,536 keywords). This Utsa Roadrunners is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Utsa Roadrunners
Keyword details
Total words: 1,968
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 31.1% 31.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 31.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst