Keyword summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utsa results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 131 hits . Analysis detected 1,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,941 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,087 of 37,536 keywords). This Utsa is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Utsa
Keyword details
Total words: 1,941
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst