Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Utes results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 927 hits . Analysis detected 3,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,145 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,260 of 36,204 keywords). This Utah Utes is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Utah Utes
Keyword details
Total words: 2,145
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 43.2% 43.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 43.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst