Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Division Of Forestry Fire And State Lands results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 2,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,696 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (28,737 of 37,536 keywords). This Utah Division Of Forestry Fire And State Lands is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Utah Division Of Forestry Fire And State Lands
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,696
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos