Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah 2nd Congressional District results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 1,088 hits . Analysis detected 10,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,064 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,246 of 34,563 keywords). This Utah 2nd Congressional District is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Utah 2nd Congressional District
Keyword details
Total words: 13,064
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst